Grounded research
Retrieve candidate authority before generating an answer, then keep the answer bounded to the selected evidence.
Incubated beta productThemis
Grounded legal research
for the Indian lawyer.
Research Indian law, inspect the judgments and statutory material retrieved for the question, and review the authority behind each answer.
The problem
What has to work.
Legal research is only useful when important propositions remain traceable to authority that a lawyer can inspect, challenge and apply with professional judgment.
Who it is for
Independent lawyersLaw firmsIn-house legal teamsLegal research teams
What ApexFlo provides
What the engagement delivers.
Inspectable judgments
Review case names, citations, relevant passages and available source material rather than accepting an unsupported summary.
Direct authority lookup
Resolve supported case names and citations directly when the authority is already known.
Conservative evaluation
Test retrieval and grounding with lawyer-reviewed questions, known authorities and explicit abstention tests.
What is delivered
✓A legal research workspace
✓Judgment and statutory retrieval
✓Source-linked answer review
✓Coverage and product-status disclosure
Research workflow
From question to
inspectable authority.
Ask
Start with a legal question, known citation or case name.
Retrieve
Search supported judgments and statutory material using semantic, lexical and direct-lookup paths.
Review
Inspect the selected cases, citations and relevant passages before relying on the answer.
Verify
Check cited authority against retrieved evidence and surface unresolved grounding issues.
Current beta coverage
Focused coverage,
ready for evaluation.
The phase-one beta combines reportable Supreme Court judgments with supported central criminal-law statute sets and keeps retrieved sources available for review.
Supreme Court judgments
37,898 reportable Indian Supreme Court judgments covering 1950–2025 in the current phase-one corpus.
Statutory material
Repository support exists for IPC, BNS, CrPC, BNSS, IEA and BSA retrieval. Combined behavior remains under beta evaluation.
High Court expansion
The current beta is focused on Supreme Court research; High Court coverage is on the expansion roadmap.
How the beta is evaluated
Grounded research.
Inspectable by the lawyer.
Authority recall
Evaluation tracks known authorities and fact-pattern retrieval, with doctrinal recall improved through lawyer-reviewed test sets.
Good-law treatment
Confirmed negative treatment is surfaced when supported by the available evidence, while the lawyer verifies currency and applicability.
Professional judgment
Themis supports research and source review; the lawyer remains responsible for the final legal position.
Confidentiality
Beta access terms define the approved data path before client-confidential facts are introduced into a research workflow.
Delivery evidence
Proof from delivery.
Validation on real systems.
37,898 reportable Supreme Court judgments
The current phase-one corpus covers reportable Indian Supreme Court judgments from 1950 through 2025. Corpus size and period are tied to the current indexed release.
Six central criminal-law statute sets
The product repository contains retrieval paths for IPC, BNS, CrPC, BNSS, IEA and BSA material. Combined product behavior remains subject to beta evaluation.
High Court expansion
The current beta is focused on Supreme Court research; High Court coverage is on the expansion roadmap.
Deployment considerations
- Themis is a research-support product in beta; lawyers verify currency, jurisdiction, treatment and applicability.
- Beta access terms define the approved data path before client-confidential material is introduced.
Next engagement step